Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from Liberia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from Liberia
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,514 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.090%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 35.9% | 40.3% |
Range | 33.3% | 37.2% |
Mean | 15.1% | 13.8% |
Median | 13.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Immigrants from Liberia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |