West Indian vs Nicaraguan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Nicaraguan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Nicaraguans
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Nicaraguan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,794,442 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.325 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,450,167 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 4.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 11.6% | 20.2% |
| Range | 9.1% | 18.5% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 8.0% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Nicaraguans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |