Venezuelan vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Venezuelan
Brazilian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Venezuelans
Brazilians
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Venezuelan vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,424,022 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,856,218 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Venezuelan | Brazilian |
Minimum | 0.62% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 29.7% | 56.7% |
Range | 29.1% | 54.0% |
Mean | 14.0% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.3% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 20.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Venezuelans and Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |