Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Latvia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Latvia
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,395,375 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 48.4% | 20.7% |
| Range | 46.1% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 9.4% |
| Median | 10.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Latvia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |