British West Indian vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Australians
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 36.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 34.4% | 78.1% |
| Range | 32.6% | 77.2% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 14.9% |
| Median | 15.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |