Guatemalan vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Australians
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,219,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 33.9%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10369/103699440c1cb23f1ef598d788fe5ed65c599a16" alt="Guatemalan vs Australian Female Poverty"
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Australian |
Minimum | 4.6% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 78.1% |
Range | 61.2% | 77.2% |
Mean | 22.9% | 14.9% |
Median | 19.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.8% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |