Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,127,815 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 44.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Minimum	1.3%	1.5%
Maximum	27.7%	100.0%
Range	26.3%	98.5%
Mean	11.5%	19.2%
Median	10.6%	17.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.3%	13.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.2%	22.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	12.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.3%	12.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.14%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Ecuadorians	0.7 /100 \| #244	Tragic 18.8%
Shoshone	0.6 /100 \| #245	Tragic 18.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.6 /100 \| #246	Tragic 18.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.5 /100 \| #247	Tragic 18.9%
French American Indians	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.2%
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%