Indian (Asian) vs Thai Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Thai
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Thais
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Thai Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,276,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 12.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Thai |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.97% |
Maximum | 27.7% | 38.0% |
Range | 26.3% | 37.1% |
Mean | 11.5% | 8.0% |
Median | 10.6% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Thais by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |