Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Pima Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Pima
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Pima
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Pima Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 93.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 22.5% | 90.8% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 29.7% |
| Median | 8.3% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 22.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 20.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |