Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Native/Alaskan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Native/Alaskan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Natives/Alaskans
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Native/Alaskan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,413,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 60.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 53.5% |
| Range | 22.5% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 24.0% |
| Median | 8.3% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Houma (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Apache (17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |