Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from England Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from England
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from England
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from England Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,609,977 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 57.1% |
Range | 22.5% | 55.9% |
Mean | 8.4% | 13.0% |
Median | 8.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from England by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |