Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Latvia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Latvia
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,727,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.29%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 40.7% |
Range | 22.5% | 39.2% |
Mean | 8.4% | 9.9% |
Median | 8.3% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latvia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.28%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |