Immigrants from Taiwan vs Luxembourger Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Luxembourger
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Luxembourgers
8.9%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Luxembourger Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,036,571 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 17.8% |
| Range | 16.8% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 6.7% |
| Median | 7.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), Thai (8.7%, a difference of 2.3%), Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |