Russian vs Luxembourger Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Luxembourger
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Russians
Luxembourgers
10.9%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Luxembourger Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,663,419 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,648,044 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.31% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 19.5% |
| Range | 75.1% | 17.9% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 7.5% |
| Median | 8.6% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Luxembourgers by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |