Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,439,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,320,666 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.34%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 9.4% | 7.9% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 59.7% |
Range | 20.6% | 51.9% |
Mean | 19.1% | 25.1% |
Median | 19.0% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 33.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |