Immigrants from South America vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Pima
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,439,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 51.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Pima |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 16.1% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.6% | 83.9% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 42.9% |
| Median | 19.0% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 55.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 30.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |