Immigrants from South America vs Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Israeli
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Israelis
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,439,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.82%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Israeli |
Minimum | 9.4% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 32.2% |
Range | 20.6% | 26.6% |
Mean | 19.1% | 16.8% |
Median | 19.0% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |