Immigrants from Scotland vs Osage Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Osage
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Osage
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Osage Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,462,038 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 31.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Osage |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 12.0% | 28.6% |
| Range | 11.0% | 27.7% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 7.1% |
| Median | 4.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Scandinavian (4.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Cypriot (4.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Estonian (4.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |