Dominican vs Osage Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Dominican
 Osage
 Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Dominicans
Osage
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Osage Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,701,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 52.5%.
 
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Osage | 
| Minimum | 2.9% | 0.88% | 
| Maximum | 20.8% | 28.6% | 
| Range | 17.9% | 27.7% | 
| Mean | 9.6% | 7.1% | 
| Median | 9.0% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 7.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.9% | 
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 7.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 7.5%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 7.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 7.6%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 8.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 9.0%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 9.0%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 9.4%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 9.6%  | 
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199  | Fair 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200  | Fair 5.4%  | 
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201  | Fair 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202  | Fair 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203  | Fair 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204  | Poor 5.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205  | Poor 5.4%  | 
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206  | Poor 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212  | Poor 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213  | Poor 5.5%  |