Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Lithuania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
 Immigrants from Lithuania
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Lithuania
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Lithuania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,584 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,711,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Lithuania | 
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.39% | 
| Maximum | 17.7% | 25.2% | 
| Range | 16.2% | 24.8% | 
| Mean | 9.1% | 8.8% | 
| Median | 9.5% | 8.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Lithuania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 11.6%  |