Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Potawatomi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
 Potawatomi
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Potawatomi
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Potawatomi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.87%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Potawatomi | 
| Minimum | 1.2% | 3.1% | 
| Maximum | 26.2% | 63.6% | 
| Range | 25.0% | 60.6% | 
| Mean | 14.0% | 20.2% | 
| Median | 14.4% | 17.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 12.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 24.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 11.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 12.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 12.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Potawatomi by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% | 
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% | 
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% | 
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% | 
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% | 
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% | 
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |