Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs French Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
French
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
French
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs French Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 571,140,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | French |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.5% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 15.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and French by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |