Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Yup'ik Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Yup'ik
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Yup'ik
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Yup'ik Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,962,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 113.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 55.6% |
| Range | 14.5% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 21.5% |
| Median | 8.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 13.6% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |