Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Lithuania
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Lithuania
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 17.6% |
| Range | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 7.0% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |