Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Thai Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
 Thai
 Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Thais
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Thai Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,089,189 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.625 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 10.0%.
 
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Thai | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.62% | 
| Maximum | 15.8% | 13.7% | 
| Range | 14.5% | 13.1% | 
| Mean | 8.4% | 5.8% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 5.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Thais by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 8.2%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 8.7%  | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 8.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 8.9%  | 
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 9.1%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 9.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 9.1%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 9.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 9.3%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 9.3%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 9.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 9.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 9.4%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 9.4%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 9.5%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 9.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 9.5%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 9.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 9.6%  | 
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 9.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 9.6%  |