Native/Alaskan vs Yup'ik Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Yup'ik
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Yup'ik
16.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Yup'ik Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,413,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,962,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 20.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 6.2% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 53.5% | 55.6% |
Range | 47.3% | 55.1% |
Mean | 24.0% | 21.5% |
Median | 21.1% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.5% | 30.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Yup'ik by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Houma (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Apache (17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |