Immigrants from Guatemala vs Scottish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Scottish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Scottish
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Scottish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,877,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 35.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Scottish |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 65.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.2% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 22.1% | 23.6% |
| Median | 20.2% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 23.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |