Finnish vs Scottish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Scottish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Finns
Scottish
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Scottish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,419,462 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,877,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Scottish |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.7% | 96.5% |
Mean | 12.8% | 23.6% |
Median | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 28.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 23.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Scottish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |