American vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
American
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Americans
Czechoslovakians
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,344,649 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 21.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.7% |
Range | 97.5% | 51.9% |
Mean | 33.9% | 24.4% |
Median | 27.8% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.7% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Americans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eritrea (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Laos (18.7%, a difference of 0.46%), Nigerian (18.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and Cape Verdean (18.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.3% |
Fijians | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.3% |
Nicaraguans | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.4% |
Marshallese | 1.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.2 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.4% |
Nigerians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.5% |
Americans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |