Immigrants vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,356,217 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 15.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants	Czechoslovakian
Minimum	3.6%	2.7%
Maximum	29.6%	54.7%
Range	26.0%	51.9%
Mean	17.8%	24.4%
Median	17.4%	20.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.7%	13.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.9%	32.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.2%	19.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.0%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.0%	13.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Aleut (17.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaskan Athabascan (17.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Ugandans	12.5 /100 \| #204	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Portugal	11.2 /100 \| #205	Poor 17.4%
German Russians	10.9 /100 \| #206	Poor 17.4%
Immigrants \| Thailand	8.2 /100 \| #207	Tragic 17.5%
Malaysians	7.6 /100 \| #208	Tragic 17.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	7.3 /100 \| #209	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Armenia	6.8 /100 \| #210	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	6.7 /100 \| #211	Tragic 17.6%
Aleuts	6.6 /100 \| #212	Tragic 17.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	6.0 /100 \| #213	Tragic 17.7%
Panamanians	5.9 /100 \| #214	Tragic 17.7%
Osage	5.8 /100 \| #215	Tragic 17.7%
Moroccans	5.6 /100 \| #216	Tragic 17.7%
Japanese	5.5 /100 \| #217	Tragic 17.7%
Iraqis	5.5 /100 \| #218	Tragic 17.7%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Native Hawaiians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.2%
South Africans	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.2%
Scottish	93.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%