Icelander vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Icelander
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Icelanders
Czechoslovakians
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,023,783 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 3.9% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.7% |
Range | 96.1% | 51.9% |
Mean | 27.6% | 24.4% |
Median | 18.9% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.0% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.2% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Portuguese (15.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Welsh (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |