Guatemalan vs U.S. Virgin Islander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
U.S. Virgin Islander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
U.S. Virgin Islanders
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs U.S. Virgin Islander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,219,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,511,950 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | U.S. Virgin Islander |
Minimum | 4.6% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 45.9% |
Range | 61.2% | 45.0% |
Mean | 22.9% | 16.9% |
Median | 19.8% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and U.S. Virgin Islanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |