Guatemalan vs Arapaho Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Arapaho
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Arapaho
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,219,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 4.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 65.8% | 58.3% |
| Range | 61.2% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 24.5% |
| Median | 19.8% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.8% | 27.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Arapaho by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |