Cuban vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,666,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 6.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 28.4% | 27.0% |
Range | 26.2% | 25.8% |
Mean | 11.4% | 9.1% |
Median | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and Cree (10.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.84%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |