Cuban vs Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Iroquois
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Iroquois
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.81%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Iroquois |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 28.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.2% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.4% | 15.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |