Cuban vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Middle Africa
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,471,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.8%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 28.4% | 16.7% |
Range | 26.2% | 16.1% |
Mean | 11.4% | 8.8% |
Median | 10.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |