Creek vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Ethiopian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Creek
Ethiopians
16.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,159,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,684,975 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 50.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 34.7% |
| Range | 96.0% | 33.6% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 10.9% |
| Median | 20.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Creek by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |