Creek vs Ethiopian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Ethiopian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Ethiopians
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Ethiopian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,230,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 32.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 45.6% |
Range | 72.7% | 43.5% |
Mean | 31.3% | 16.3% |
Median | 28.4% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Hungarian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |