Bhutanese vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Ethiopian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Ethiopians
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,684,975 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.83%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 34.7% |
| Range | 55.5% | 33.6% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 10.9% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Ethiopians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |