Immigrants from Bolivia vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Ethiopian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Ethiopians
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Ethiopian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,105,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,684,975 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 50.6% | 34.7% |
| Range | 49.4% | 33.6% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 10.9% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Ethiopians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |