Immigrants from Chile vs Soviet Union Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
 Soviet Union
 Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Soviet Union
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Soviet Union Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,566,097 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.30%.
 
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Soviet Union | 
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.80% | 
| Maximum | 36.4% | 23.2% | 
| Range | 35.6% | 22.4% | 
| Mean | 11.6% | 9.1% | 
| Median | 10.2% | 8.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 11.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty | 
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159  | Good 11.0%  | 
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160  | Good 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169  | Average 11.1%  | 
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170  | Average 11.1%  | 
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171  | Average 11.2%  |