Chippewa vs Slovene Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Slovene
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Slovenes
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Slovene Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,368,188 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 3.8%, a difference of 41.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Slovene |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 34.1% | 14.4% |
Range | 32.9% | 14.2% |
Mean | 8.4% | 3.8% |
Median | 5.6% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.76%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |