Chippewa vs Pakistani Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Pakistani
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Pakistanis
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Pakistani Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,416,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 15.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Pakistani |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 34.1% | 41.7% |
Range | 32.9% | 41.0% |
Mean | 8.4% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |