Chippewa vs Immigrants from Brazil Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Brazil
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Brazil
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Brazil Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,364,387 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 9.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 34.1% | 34.3% |
Range | 32.9% | 33.4% |
Mean | 8.4% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |