Chinese vs Ute Female Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Ute
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Chinese
Ute
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
22.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Ute Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,500 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.46%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Ute |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 27.1% | 35.7% |
| Range | 24.4% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 15.9% |
| Median | 12.6% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Ute by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Barbados (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zaire (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Panama | 25.5 /100 | #196 | Fair 12.3% |
| Hondurans | 25.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 12.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |