Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Jordan
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 23.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 64.9% |
| Range | 22.5% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 13.0% |
| Median | 10.4% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |