Chinese vs Turkish Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Chinese
Turkish
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Chinese
Turks
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Turkish Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,582,938 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 11.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Turkish |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 53.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.0% | 99.1% |
Mean | 14.4% | 20.7% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 24.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (14.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Norwegian (14.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese (14.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Latvian (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Moldova (14.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Koreans | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Norwegians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Soviet Union | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.7% |