Chinese vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chinese Turks

COMPARE

Chinese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw ChileanChineseChippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Turkish

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian TsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 30-34

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison

Chinese

Turks

Excellent

Exceptional

85.0%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34

89.6/ 100

METRIC RATING

131st/ 347

METRIC RANK

85.7%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34

99.9/ 100

METRIC RATING

40th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chinese vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,716,340 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 0.79%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Turkish
Minimum	64.1%	59.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	35.9%	41.0%
Mean	87.3%	85.8%
Median	86.4%	86.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.3%	83.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	90.6%	88.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	9.0%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Australians	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Jordan	91.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 85.0%
Austrians	90.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 85.0%
Slavs	90.7 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	90.0 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 85.0%
Chinese	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Israel	89.5 /100 \| #132	Excellent 85.0%
New Zealanders	89.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Chile	89.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Asia	88.9 /100 \| #135	Excellent 85.0%
Jordanians	88.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 85.0%
South Africans	88.0 /100 \| #137	Excellent 85.0%
Sri Lankans	87.8 /100 \| #138	Excellent 85.0%

Demographics Similar to Turks by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (85.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	99.9 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 85.8%
Ugandans	99.9 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 85.8%
Serbians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 85.8%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 85.7%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 85.7%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 85.7%
Eastern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 85.7%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 85.7%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 85.7%
Zimbabweans	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 85.6%
Croatians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.6%