Central American vs Immigrants from South America Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Immigrants from South America
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Immigrants from South America
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Immigrants from South America Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,895,847 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 479,571,466 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 17.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Immigrants from South America |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 41.9% | 12.3% |
Range | 39.8% | 9.4% |
Mean | 9.7% | 6.3% |
Median | 7.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 1.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Cuban (6.8%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Ghanaian (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Cherokee (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (5.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |