Bulgarian vs Latvian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Latvian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Latvians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Latvian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,529,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 90.7% |
| Range | 95.0% | 84.7% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 24.7% |
| Median | 18.0% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Latvians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |